A prominent state-owned bank has suspended its “high-interest high-rebate” auto installment loan program effective June 1, according to multiple industry sources. This development follows recent self-regulatory conventions issued by banking associations across China, prohibiting dealerships from recommending high-commission financial products or misleading consumers about loan terms.
The controversial model involved banks paying substantial rebates to car dealers, who would then convert portions into price discounts for customers. Consumers were often advised to take long-term loans (typically 5 years) but repay early (within 2 years), creating an illusion of “interest-free” periods through rebate-funded compensation.
The Illusion of Three-Win Scenario
Industry veteran Yang Tian (pseudonym) explained the mechanics: “At peak competition, rebates reached 10% of loan values. For a ¥500,000 vehicle, the ¥50,000 rebate would cover two years’ interest, creating ‘interest-free’ perception through immediate rebates after purchase completion.”
However, this system bred multiple issues: banks faced unexpected losses when early repayments exceeded projections, consumers encountered hidden penalties, and market distortions emerged. A Beijing 4S store salesperson confirmed: “We still offer rebates but now prohibit repayments within two years.”
Mounting Problems Surface
Consumer complaints have surged regarding undisclosed prepayment penalties. The “Black Cat” complaint platform shows thousands of auto loan grievances, while social media reveals widespread confusion about repayment terms.
“Some banks now clearly disclose prepayment restrictions, but others bury these clauses where consumers might overlook them,” Yang noted during our investigation.
Legal and Regulatory Concerns
Liu Chengdong, legal expert at Kant Think Tank, identified multiple violations: “High rebates constitute improper competition under Anti-Unfair Competition Law. If effective interest rates exceed 4x LPR, they may qualify as usury. Chongqing regulators have already ordered cleanup of such practices.”
Liu emphasized consumer rights violations when dealers fail to disclose true costs or repayment conditions, misleading buyers into unfavorable decisions.
Nationwide Rectification Efforts
Regulatory actions are accelerating:
- Chongqing’s January directive mandated clear consumer disclosures and prohibited market-share tactics through excessive rebates
- Kaifeng’s May convention banned dealers from promoting high-commission products or pressuring early repayments
- Sichuan’s June 1 implementation requires competition through service quality rather than financial incentives
Industry reactions remain mixed. While some sales staff express anxiety about impacts, Yang Tian observes: “Many loan demands were artificially created by sales tactics anyway. The market needs this correction.”
Consumer Protection Recommendations
Experts advise buyers to:
- Demand written confirmation of prepayment terms
- Scrutinize contract clauses about fees and penalties
- Compare rates against official benchmarks
- Document all sales communications
As the auto finance sector undergoes this structural adjustment, the focus shifts toward transparent pricing and sustainable business practices rather than artificial incentives.
Related topics:
